1 | // RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=alpha.clone.CloneChecker -analyzer-config alpha.clone.CloneChecker:MinimumCloneComplexity=10 -verify %s |
2 | |
3 | // This tests if we search for clones in functions. |
4 | |
5 | void log(); |
6 | |
7 | int max(int a, int b) { // expected-warning{{Duplicate code detected}} |
8 | log(); |
9 | if (a > b) |
10 | return a; |
11 | return b; |
12 | } |
13 | |
14 | int maxClone(int x, int y) { // expected-note{{Similar code here}} |
15 | log(); |
16 | if (x > y) |
17 | return x; |
18 | return y; |
19 | } |
20 | |
21 | // Functions below are not clones and should not be reported. |
22 | |
23 | // The next two functions test that statement classes are still respected when |
24 | // checking for clones in expressions. This will show that the statement |
25 | // specific data of all base classes is collected, and not just the data of the |
26 | // first base class. |
27 | int testBaseClass(int a, int b) { // no-warning |
28 | log(); |
29 | if (a > b) |
30 | return true ? a : b; |
31 | return b; |
32 | } |
33 | int testBaseClass2(int a, int b) { // no-warning |
34 | log(); |
35 | if (a > b) |
36 | return __builtin_choose_expr(true, a, b); |
37 | return b; |
38 | } |
39 | |
40 | // No clone because of the different comparison operator. |
41 | int min1(int a, int b) { // no-warning |
42 | log(); |
43 | if (a < b) |
44 | return a; |
45 | return b; |
46 | } |
47 | |
48 | // No clone because of the different pattern in which the variables are used. |
49 | int min2(int a, int b) { // no-warning |
50 | log(); |
51 | if (a > b) |
52 | return b; |
53 | return a; |
54 | } |
55 | |
56 | int foo(int a, int b) { // no-warning |
57 | return a + b; |
58 | } |
59 | |