1 | // RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core -analyzer-output=text -analyzer-config graph-trim-interval=5 -analyzer-config suppress-null-return-paths=false -verify %s |
2 | // RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=core -analyzer-output=plist-multi-file -analyzer-config graph-trim-interval=5 -analyzer-config suppress-null-return-paths=false %s -o %t.plist |
3 | // RUN: cat %t.plist | %diff_plist %S/Inputs/expected-plists/eager-reclamation-path-notes.cpp.plist - |
4 | |
5 | typedef struct { |
6 | int getValue(); |
7 | } IntWrapper; |
8 | |
9 | IntWrapper *getNullWrapper() { |
10 | return 0; |
11 | // expected-note@-1 {{Returning null pointer}} |
12 | } |
13 | |
14 | int memberCallBaseDisappears() { |
15 | // In this case, we need the lvalue-to-rvalue cast for 'ptr' to disappear, |
16 | // which means we need to trigger reclamation between that and the -> |
17 | // operator. |
18 | // |
19 | // Note that this test is EXTREMELY brittle because it's a negative test: |
20 | // we want to show that even if the node for the rvalue of 'ptr' disappears, |
21 | // we get the same results as if it doesn't. The test should never fail even |
22 | // if our node reclamation policy changes, but it could easily not be testing |
23 | // anything at that point. |
24 | IntWrapper *ptr = getNullWrapper(); |
25 | // expected-note@-1 {{Calling 'getNullWrapper'}} |
26 | // expected-note@-2 {{Returning from 'getNullWrapper'}} |
27 | // expected-note@-3 {{'ptr' initialized to a null pointer value}} |
28 | |
29 | // Burn some nodes to trigger reclamation. |
30 | int unused = 1; |
31 | (void)unused; |
32 | |
33 | return ptr->getValue(); // expected-warning {{Called C++ object pointer is null}} |
34 | // expected-note@-1 {{Called C++ object pointer is null}} |
35 | } |
36 | |
37 | |