1 | // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s |
2 | |
3 | // This is a test for an egregious hack in Clang that works around |
4 | // issues with GCC's evolution. libstdc++ 4.2.x uses __is_pod as an |
5 | // identifier (to declare a struct template like the one below), while |
6 | // GCC 4.3 and newer make __is_pod a keyword. Clang treats __is_pod as |
7 | // a keyword *unless* it is introduced following the struct keyword. |
8 | |
9 | template<typename T> |
10 | struct __is_pod { // expected-warning {{keyword '__is_pod' will be made available as an identifier}} |
11 | __is_pod() {} |
12 | }; |
13 | |
14 | __is_pod<int> ipi; |
15 | |
16 | // Ditto for __is_same. |
17 | template<typename T> |
18 | struct __is_same { // expected-warning {{keyword '__is_same' will be made available as an identifier}} |
19 | }; |
20 | |
21 | __is_same<int> isi; |
22 | |
23 | // Another, similar egregious hack for __is_signed, which is a type |
24 | // trait in Embarcadero's compiler but is used as an identifier in |
25 | // libstdc++. |
26 | struct test_is_signed { |
27 | static const bool __is_signed = true; // expected-warning {{keyword '__is_signed' will be made available as an identifier}} |
28 | }; |
29 | |
30 | bool check_signed = test_is_signed::__is_signed; |
31 | |
32 | template<bool B> struct must_be_true {}; |
33 | template<> struct must_be_true<false>; |
34 | |
35 | void foo() { |
36 | bool b = __is_pod(int); |
37 | must_be_true<__is_pod(int)> mbt; |
38 | } |
39 | |
40 | // expected-warning@+1 {{declaration does not declare anything}} |
41 | struct // expected-error {{declaration of anonymous struct must be a definition}} |
42 | #pragma pack(pop) |
43 | S { |
44 | }; |
45 | |
46 | #if !__has_feature(is_pod) |
47 | # error __is_pod should still be available. |
48 | #endif |
49 | |